Psychological reductionism is the process of reducing all social activity and behavior to the psychological characteristics of the human actors involved. Psychological reduction eliminates the possibility of sociology since it denies that there is anything greater than the individual. Psychological reductionism should be considered as a scientific stance which favours interdisciplinary co-operation. Society is simply an aggregation of individuals. Psychological reductionism tries to prove that psychological processes are merely a product of biological functions.
David Emile Durkheim argued against this in his study of suicide by arguing, and demonstrating, that even after providing a psychological explanation for individual acts of suicide there was something still to account for: the difference in suicide rates between societies. This Durkheim showed, was derived from characteristics of the society and could not be explained as dependent on individual psychological characteristics.
Reductionism
Revisited - On the Role of Reduction in Psychology
Marko Barendregt, J. F. Hans van Rappard, Vrije Universiteit - Psychological
reductionism
is often linked with the mind-body problem. This paper reviews the reductionism debate and
concludes that many of its controversies can indeed be traced to the relation between
reduction and the metaphysical mind-body problem. It is proposed that
psychological reductionism, by bridging different theories, rather should be
considered as a scientific stance which favours interdisciplinary co-operation. This perspective on
psychological reductionism
throws a new light on the classical model of reduction, which may capture important
aspects of intertheoretic reductions if it is recognized that the bridges between theories
do not need to comply completely with the classical conditions.
Maddening Melancholy:
The Perils of Psychological Reductionism in Walker Percy
Richard Ford, and Jonathan Franzen, Robert Scott Stewart, Cape Breton University.
Over the past twenty odd years, North America has witnessed the complete medicalization of
unhappiness by transforming it into depression, which has been conceived in
psychologically reductionistic terms. Many are unhappy with this state of affairs,
including the contemporary American novelists, Walker Percy, Richard Ford, and Jonathan
Franzen. This paper explores why they are unhappy with this trend and why they reject
psychological reductionism in favor of a vision of life that is more thoroughly moral in
its outlook.
The Disorderly Crowd:
From Classical Psychological Reductionism to Socio-Contextual Theory - The Impact on
Public Order Policing Strategies, DAVID WADDINGTON, Sheffield Hallam
University, MIKE KING, University of Central England.
Abstract: Following the publication in 1895 of Gustav Le Bon's seminal work, The Crowd: A
Study of the Popular Mind, psychological explanation or psychological
reductionism of collective disorder unremittingly
emphasised the supposedly anomalous and irrational nature of the phenomenon. Recently,
however, this classical theoretical tradition has been supplanted by increasingly
enlightened social-psychological and socio-political approaches which emphasise the
importance to our understanding of the contexts, dynamics and underlying meanings of
episodes of public disorder.