Political Policing is the way in which the process of policing the community acts in the maintainance and reinforcement of deference to authority. By living within a system of social order people are socialized (socialization) by political policing to accept that order and the way this is justified by legitimating ideas, like tradition, inspired leadership or representative democracy.
Political Policing can also mean more narrowly the way in which police activity, while superficially about maintenance of the criminal law, can be about the control or surveillance of particular social groups and communities.
Deviance in political policing of political activities may be either legal or behavioral. Both are generated to satisfy external demands without risking undeniable failure. Demand for results regardless of methods makes legal deviance inevitable and deviant behavior probable. Deviance in political policing is very unlikely to be inhibited significantly by legal reforms or public politics.
Political Policing in Hong
Kong - Hualing Fu, University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law - Richard
Cullen, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract: Modern states, democratic ones in particular, have grown to prefer the use of more subtle, or at least less visible, police surveillance to open confrontation in a courtroom, where the state itself may be scrutinised in public. Hong Kong's political police unit, the Special Branch, was indispensable to Hong Kong's colonial political order.
Although it was disbanded before the handover of Hong Kong to China in 1997, political policing and monitoring probably continue under the new legal order. This article examines the historical origin of political policing in Hong Kong, including the establishment of the Special Branch and its initial focus on communism in Hong Kong. It explores the relevance of political policing to contemporary society.
Organizational Deviance and Political Policing (From Organizational Police Deviance - Its Structure and Control - P 111-125, 1981, Clifford D Shearing, ed., A T Turk.
This article seeks to clarify the meaning of deviance by and within organizations engaged
in political policing. This article clarifies the meaning of deviance by and within
organizations engaged in political policing, points out the structural sources of such
Deviance in political policing usually occurs either as demonstrable violations of legal rules or as blameworthy failures to accomplish organizational objectives. Any conception of legal deviance in political policing inevitably clashes with the fact that such organizations are invented to prevent radical political changes.
Political policing agencies are assigned the specific task of detecting and neutralizing any present or potential deviations from the ground rules of conventional politics. The article defines the goals of political police organizations based on what is known or reported about their activities and lists in order of decreasing probability policing actions that may be deviant under law if the organization cannot sustain a denial under internal or external review. Political, legal, and organizational proposals for curtailing deviance in political policing are outlined. The generous formal authorizations for political policing are supplemented by secret directives that spell out what may be only implicit in the authorizations.