PER CAPITA
Capita comes from a Latin term
referring to head. Criminologists and sociologists refer to crimes (or divorce rates etc.)
per capita .
For example if there are only 0.01 crimes per
capita, this would mean that you have a risk of 1% of being victimised.
Criminologists usually use the idea of a rate
per 100,000 rather than the idea of per capita.
Per capita income is a measure of the wealth of an
areas population as well as an indicator of the economic health of that region or
country. Per capita income is determined by dividing the total income of a region or
county residents by the total population.
The Effect of State Income Taxation on Per Capita Income
Growth - Randall G. Holcombe, Florida State Univ, Donald J. Lacombe, Ohio Univ -
Public Finance Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, (2004)
This study examines the impact of changes in marginal state income tax rates on per capita
income by comparing income growth in counties on state borders with income growth in
adjacent counties across the state border. Compared to a standard cross-sectional
analysis, this border-matching technique is a better way to hold constant many factors
that can vary for geographical reasons, such as climate, culture, and proximity to
markets. The results show that over the 30-year period from 1960 to 1990, states that
raised their income tax rates more than their neighbors had slower income growth and, on
average, a 3.4% reduction in per capita income.
Demographic destiny, per-capita consumption and the
Japanese saving-investment balance, R Dekle, Oxf Rev Econ Policy 2000; 16:46-60
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Abstract: In this paper, we revisit the issue of the impact of demographic change on the
Japanese saving investment balance. Using updated government projections, we show that the
ageing of the population under way will steadily lower Japan's saving rate from 31 per
cent of GDP today to 20 per cent of GDP in 2040. Japan's investment rate will remain close
to its current level of 29 per cent. Thus, Japan's saving investment balance, or current
account, will steadily decrease from its current level and will turn negative in 2025. In
addition, we project the impact of demographic change on the evolution of Japanese
consumption per capita, or 'living standards'. Despite the population ageing, we project
that per-capita consumption will grow until 2010. However, under certain scenarios,
consumption per capita falls in most years after 2010. -
oxrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/2/46
Human capital and per capita product: A comparison of US
states
Saurav Dev Bhatta, Jose Lobo
Papers in Regional Science, Volume 79 Issue 4 Page 393 - October 2000
Abstract.This article analyzes the extent to which human capital differences can explain
the differences in gross state product (GSP) per capita levels between the richer and
poorer states of the US. It uses 1990 Census and Bureau of Economic Analysis data on
educational attainment, wage levels of different segments of the labor force, and GSP to
compare New York our representative rich state with the poorest third of the
states. The findings indicate that human capital differences explain at least 49% of the
observed difference in GSP per capita between New York and each of the poor states.
-
Growth Rates of Per-Capita Income and Aggregate Welfare: An International Comparison
Nanak Kakwani, University of New South Wales, The Review of Economics & Statistics,
May 1997, Vol. 79, No. 2, Pages 201-211 Posted Online March 13, 2006.
This paper is concerned with the measurement of aggregate growth rates, where the
aggregation is over time. The paper demonstrates that any mechanical procedures for
computing aggregate growth rate has welfare implications, and value judgments implicit in
various commonly used procedures are not appealing. A new procedure suggested in the paper
captures all the essential properties of a welfare function. The methodology of the paper
is applied to an analysis of growth rates of per capita GNP of 83 developing countries
during the 19701987 period. - mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/003465397556782
Infant mortality, per capita income, and adult illiteracy: an ecological approach
R Tresserras, J Canela, J Alvarez, J Sentis and L Salleras, Health Department, Public
Health Services, Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, American Journal of Public
Health, Vol 82, Issue 3 435-438, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health
Association
The ecological association of infant mortality rate (IM) with per capita income (PI) and
prevalence of adult illiteracy (AI) has been studied using countries as the unit of
analysis. A negative association between IM and PI in 1960 and 1982 has been observed
(sample correlation coefficient [r] = -.625 and r = -.729, respectively; P less than .05).
A correlation between IM and AI has been found for both men and women (r = .827 and r =
.855, respectively; P less than .05). The ecological relative risks were 7.43 for men and
5.82 for women (95% confidence intervals: 5.16-10.71 and 4.36-7.75, respectively). The
association of IM and PI shows a slight but not significant improvement between 1960 and
1982. AI can be considered a good predictor of IM in countries. -
ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/82/3/435
Working Paper Series, FIEF - Trade Union Institute for Economic Research - No 156:
Demographic and Per Capita Income Dynamics: A Convergence Study on Demographics, Human
Capital, and Per Capita Income for the US States - Joakim Persson
Abstract: This paper finds that age distribution, educational attainment, and government
size converge across the US states at rates rather similar to the convergence rate for per
capita income. The main part of the paper takes age distribution variables as exogenous in
conditional convergence regressions. Using panel data, the estimated partial relation
between age and the subsequent growth rate of per capita income is hump-shaped and of
quantitative importance. This result is robust to conditioning on other variables and
appear not only to reflect capital-dilution. Another result is that average years of
schooling has a positive effect on growth only if age distribution is controlled for.
These findings are consistent with an explanation that the age distribution reflects the
growth effects of human capital accumulated through experience. -
swopec.hhs.se/fiefwp/abs/fiefwp0156.htm
What contributed to the major decline in per capita cigarette consumption during
Californias comprehensive tobacco control programme?
Elizabeth A Gilpin, Karen Messer, Martha M White and John P Pierce
Tobacco Control 2006;15:308-316; © 2006 by BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of
California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
PhD, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Moores UCSD Cancer Center, University of
California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive #0901, La Jolla, CA 92093-0901, USA;
jppierce@ucsd.edu
Objectives: California experienced a notable decline in per capita cigarette consumption
during its comprehensive tobacco control programme. This study examines what proportion of
the decline occurred from: (1) fewer ever smokers in the population, (2) more ever smokers
quitting, and (3) current smokers smoking less.
Design, subjects: Per capita cigarette consumption computed from cigarette sales and from
adult respondents to the large, cross-sectional, population-based California Tobacco
Surveys of 1990 (n = 24 296), 1996 (n = 18 616) and 2002 (n = 20 525) were examined for
similar trends.
Main outcome measure: Changes (period 1: 19901996; period 2: 19962002) in per
capita cigarette consumption from self-reported survey data were partitioned for the
entire population and for demographic subgroups into the three components mentioned
above.
Results: In periods 1 and 2, most of the decline in per capita cigarette consumption for
the population as a whole was from current smokers smoking less followed by a reduction in
ever smokers. The decline from smokers smoking less was particularly evident among young
adults (1829 years) in period 1. While the portion of the decline due to quitting in
the entire population in period 1 was negligible, in period 2 it accounted for 22% of the
total per capita decline. The decline from quitting in period 2 was mostly observed among
women.
Conclusions: Rather than near-term benefits from smokers quitting, population health
benefits from reduced per capita cigarette consumption will likely occur over the longer
term from fewer people becoming ever smokers, and more less-addicted smokers eventually
quitting successfully. - tc.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/15/4/308
|