The term 'objectivity' is used in two distinct but related ways. Objectivity in Social Science refers to the actions of a social scientist: assuming a position of disinterestedness or impartiality, or being open-minded in the assessment of evidence. Objectivity is thought to be central to the procedures of the scientific method. Objectivity also refers to the nature of the statements people make: a statement can be objective as opposed to the scientist being objective. An objective statement is one which can be agreed upon by others regardless of their backgrounds or biases. Subjectivism accords primacy to subjective experience as fundamental of all measure and law.
Objectivity in Social
Science - Toward a Hermeneutical Evolutionary Theory
Ricardo Waizbort, Casa de Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Brazil, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 1, (2004).
Austin Harringtons book, Hermeneutic Dialogue and Social Science: A critique of Gadamer and Habermas, intends to present an account of debates on objectivity in the social sciences, in stressing the political and epistemological responsibility, in public spheres, to those who want to create a fairer understanding of societies and history, without demonizing natural enterprises or leaving social studies out of acute critical questioning.
The objectivity norm in
Michael Schudson, University of California, San Diego, USA.
Journalism, Vol. 2, No. 2, 149-170 (2001).
Why did the occupational norm of objectivity arise in American journalism? This question has attracted the interest of many journalism historians but it has not previously been examined as an instance of a more general social phenomenon, the emergence of new cultural norms and ideals.
Alternative technological and economic explanations of the emergence of objectivity are criticized and the difficulty of understanding why objectivity as a norm emerged first and most fully in the United States rather than in European journalism is discussed.