Moral pluralism is also known as ethical pluralism or value pluralism. Moral pluralism is the idea that there are several values which may be equally correct and fundamental, and yet in conflict with each other. Moral pluralism also postulates that such incompatible values may be immeasurable.Best Replica Watches Moral pluralism is the view that there can be conflicting moral values that are each worthy of respect. Moral pluralism is an alternative to both moral relativism and moral absolutism. Moral pluralists believe that moral issues are generally complicated, and no particular philosophical approach will provide all the answers always. Moral pluralists are open-minded when faced with competing viewpoints. Moral pluralists analyze issues before them from several moral points of view before deciding and taking action they conceive as appropriate.
An example of moral pluralism is the idea that the moral life of a nun is incompatible with that of a mother, yet there is no purely rational measure of which is preferable. Moral pluralism occupies a sensible middle ground between “there is only one right answer” as moral absolutism says, and “there is no wrong answer” as moral relativism claims. Take for example, a situation where a person has the opportunity to children trapped in a burning building, but there is fear that the any action might result in the death of the person, leaving his or her own children orphans.
A moral pluralist would conclude that there is no definitive way to decide which is the better course of moral action. Moral pluralism postulates that it is sometimes difficult to choose between competing values.
Under moral pluralism, moral decisions often require radical preferences with no rational calculus to determine which alternative is to be selected. Pluralism describes a society where individual and group differences are present and are celebrated as enriching the social fabric. Moral pluralism is the assumption there are moral truths, but that they do not form a body of consistent truths as those found in the sciences.
Moral pluralism is an alternative to both moral relativism and moral absolutism. Moral relativism is a moral doctrine which means we ought to respect other cultures, and allow them to solve moral problems as they see fit. Moral relativism is not absolute and not universal but relative and particular. Moral relativism is only valid for a particular place, time, community, tradition, culture or group of persons. Moral relativism is the thesis that moral claims are true only relative to some standard of framework that is not itself uniquely justified; there is no single right morality and there is a variety of possible moralities. (Boot, 2014).
Moral Pluralism and the Origin of Political Conflict, Ferrell, Jason. Abstract: Political institutions have frequently been justified as a response to conflict. Consequently, assumptions about the nature of conflict often shape our conceptions of what is political. Two of the most prevalent interpretations of conflict perspectives regard it as either a contest of interest or a competition for resources.
There is another conception of conflict, one tied to the idea of moral pluralism, which offers a different interpretation of this idea, and therefore prompts a reconsideration of how we justify our institutions. To show this I will review arguments concerning the origin of conflict as understood by game theory’s conception of the prisoner’s dilemma, as seen in the work of David Gauthier, and the idea of the “tragedy of the commons.”
Moral Pluralism and Liberal Democracy: Isaiah Berlin's Heterodox Liberalism - William A. Galston. Abstract: While Isaiah Berlin considered himself principally as a political theorist in the liberal tradition, his was an unorthodox liberalism in both method and substance, rooted in the confluence of three traditions, British, Russian, and Jewish. Unlike many liberals, he wrestled with the tension between universalism and particularism, and also between individualism and communalities.
Moral Pluralism in Business Ethics Education: It is About Time, Brian K. Burton, Craig P. Dunn, Michael Goldsby. The teaching of business ethics is almost inherently pluralistic, but little evidence of explicitly pluralistic approaches exists in teaching materials besides the available decision-making frameworks. In this article, it is argued that the field needs to acknowledge and adopt pluralism as the standard pedagogical approach.
Moral Pluralism and the Environment, Andrew Brennan. Abstract: Cost-benefit analysis makes the assumption that everything from consumer goods to endangered species may in principle be given a value by which its worth can be compared with that of anything else, even though the actual measurement of such value may be difficult in practice. A radical moral pluralism is recommended as in no way incompatible with the requirements of rationality, which allows that the business of living decently involves many kinds of principles and various sorts of responsibilities.
Lawyers, Justice and the Challenge of Moral Pluralism, Katherine R. Kruse, William S.
Abstract: Traditionalists defend the amoral role of lawyers, arguing that lawyers should remain moral neutral in their representation of clients. This article focuses attention on a subject missing from the debate among lawyering theorists: the challenge of moral pluralism. Moral pluralism has been widely discussed in political and moral philosophy. This article explores what political and moral theorists say about the sources of moral pluralism.
The article then uses
this analysis to examine the shortcomings of both the traditional model of morally neutral
lawyering, and the alternative social justice lawyering models, in the face of moral
pluralism. The existence of moral pluralism also alleviates the concern that lawyers will
act in moral concert, thus eliminating the logical aspects of the last lawyer in town
problem, and leaving only logistical concerns with the provision of legal counsel.
Moral pluralism in abortion, Gardell MA, In: Abortion and the status of
the fetus, edited by William B. Bondeson, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr.,
Stuart F. Spicker and Daniel H. Winship. Dordrecht, Netherlands, D. Reidel
Publishing, 1984.
Abstract: This discussion argues that the state of moral pluralism
characterizing the abortion debate reflects an acceptance of both the
implications of human reason and the obligation to reflect the autonomy of
competent individuals.
Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion, Dr G
Pennings.
Reproductive tourism comes under the broader term medical tourism.
Three possible solutions are discussed: internal moral pluralism, coerced conformity, and
international harmonisation. Reproductive tourism is moral pluralism realised by moving
across legal borders.
Differences between Moral Relativism and Moral Pluralism: the advantage of Moral Pluralism in Society. - Pau Sian Lian, Lian Pi.