Looking-Glass Self was developed by Charles Horton Cooley (1864-1929) to describe the social nature of the self and the link between society and individual. The concept of the looking glass-self theory constitutes the cornerstone of the sociological theory of socialization. In Looking Glass Self formulation social interaction is like a mirror, it allows us to see ourselves as others see us. Looking-Glass Self was an early formulation of symbolic interactionism but less influential than that of George Herbert Mead. The social self is simply any idea, or system of ideas, drawn from the communicative life, that the mind cherishes as its own. Self-feeling has its chief scope within the general life, not outside of it. The term "looking-glass self" was coined by Cooley in his work, Human Nature and the Social Order in 1902. The Journal of Family Psychology in 1998, measured the validity of the looking-glass self and symbolic interaction in the context of familial relationships.
Charles Horton Cooley describes the construction of one’s “looking-glass self” to occur in three definitive steps. The first step, according to Cooley is, “the imagination of our appearance to the other person” (Cooley 1902, 189). In other words, we, to the best of our abilities, put ourselves in the heads of others and try to evaluate our appearance from an external perspective. Second, we imagine “his judgment of that appearance” (Cooley 189). So, after we first imagine our appearance from another individual’s perspective, we imagine what that individual thinks about what we imagine they have concluded. Based upon what we think of the judgments of the external individual, we experience the third step: “some sort of feeling such as pride or mortification” (Cooley 1902, 189).
The looking-glass self comprises three main components (Yeung, et al. 2003). We imagine how we must appear to others, we imagine and react to what we feel their judgment of that appearance must be, and we develop our self through the judgments of others. A self-idea of this sort seems to have three principal elements: the imagination of our appearance to the other person; the imagination of his judgment of that appearance, and some sort of self-feeling, such as pride or mortification. The comparison with a looking-glass self hardly suggests the second element, the imagined judgment, which is quite essential. The thing that moves us to pride or shame is not the mere mechanical reflection of ourselves, but an imputed sentiment, the imagined effect of this reflection upon another's mind.
The concept of the looking-glass self describes the development of one's self through one's interpersonal interactions within the context of society. This is evident from the fact that the character in whose mind we see ourselves, makes all the difference with our feeling. We are ashamed to seem evasive in the presence of a straightforward man, cowardly in the presence of a brave one, gross in the eyes of a refined one, and so on.
The Looking-Glass Self - Charles Horton Cooley, Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Scribner's, 1902.
through the Looking Glass Self. The development of Stereotypes and
Emad Rahim. Abstract: The looking-glass self, a concept created by Charles Cooley supported the theory that individuals learn to see themselves based on how society views them. The looking-glass self presented the idea that all of us take on characteristics that are predominately influenced by what we believe society perceives of us to be. This article will explore terminology and concepts essential for understanding the notion of the looking glass self with comparison to that of how social stereotypes and labelling can influence behavior, attitudes and belief of marginalised groups of people as described by Adams, Bell and Griffin (2007).