Intellectual Property Management
IPR Intellectual Property Rights
Companies can reap the benefits of smart intellectual property
management strategies as it competes in a global market. There are many things we can't
control in a business but we can control IP. Intellectual property management can help a
company to gain and sustain competitive advantage.
How the production and exchange of technology differs from more
traditional economic goods?
Do we have the tools and IP Strategies for Creating and Leveraging our
IP Portfolio.? How can we get an early warning of potential IP conflicts?
Do employer policies and IP strategy affect incentives to discover new
commercially valuable technologies?
Since the year 2000 a lot of work has been done in the area of
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) management. It is absolutely essential to educate
employees or partners about their rights and responsibilities regarding intellectual
Business or even an individual can achieve success through development
and marketing that takes due account of intellectual property rights.
Enforcing intellectual property rights is expensive in countries around
the world. It's important to get things right from the start. Just having a patent isn't
enough to protect an invention from the fierce competition of the market.
Success, for a large number of companies, has been driven by the development of
intellectual property. A company must invest resources in intellectual property because
the industry has become IP-intensive. Information dissemination is rapid today calling for
greater protection of ideas.
People are now aware of the importance of intellectual property management and trade
secrets protection. They no longer fear that their competitors will have access to the
information and copy it.
Managing intellectual property is absolutely important for a company's
growth and development.
property abuses: how should multinationals respond? - Long range planning
property and development : lessons from recent economic research - by Carsten Fink and
Keith E. Maskus.
dilemma for developing countries in intellectual property strategy? Lessons from a
case study of software piracy and Microsoft in China - Science & public policy
Efforts Are Achieving Credible IP Enforcement Even Amid Chronic Abuse - Intellectual
property & technology law journal
Granstrand's comprehensive study examining IP use, management and
strategies in general, and in Japan in particular, is Economics and Management of
Intellectual Property (Granstrand, 1999b). In addition to the detailed account and
analysis of the results of his own survey of large Japanese corporations, the author
compares the Japanese situation and the strategies of large corporations in Sweden and
also occasionally in the US.
Granstrand's historical overview of Japanese patenting provides an enlightening
introduction to the subject. The Meiji dynasty opened Japan to the world in 1868 and
introduced a patent system inspired by the US and Europe 3 years later. The Tokugawa
dynasty introduced the Ordinance Prohibiting Innovations in 1718 in order to
prohibit new things.
Granstrand reminds the reader that with regard to the monopoly power conferred by patents,
an important distinction to be made is that a patent provides first of all a monopoly on
an input: (1) many other costly complimentary inputs may be needed before monopoly profits
are gained and (2) as with many inputs, a patent may be substituted by other patented or
For detailed observations on the semiconductor industry's IP management and strategies in
consortia - Tilton (1973), Ham et al. (1998), Grindley and Teece (1997) and Headley
Grindley and Teece (1997) provide a detailed account of the pro-active approach to IPR
management in Semiconductors and Electronics and specifically linking IPR to core
business, developing patent portfolios and the licensing practices of leading firms (RCA,
ATT&T, IBM, Intel, Hitachi, Hewlett-Packard, etc.). The article offers examples of how
leading companies managed IP and created patent portfolios, and how these were generating
royalty revenues from firms that had less to offer in exchange. The licensing strategies
were shaped by public policies.
The growing interest in the management of IP has resulted in efforts to improve its
measurement. IP performance is now measured in ways other than simple patent counts. The
emerging measures combine quantitative and qualitative aspects and enable organizations to
better evaluate and manage their patent portfolios Bratic et al. (2002).
Valuation of IP
One of the most important steps in managing IP is to establish its value. Valuation is the
process of ascribing value to technology. Valuation is particularly crucial for the
commercialization of early technologies, for licensing and for mergers and acquisitions
Probably the best sources on the valuation of IP in general are Razgaitis (2002), Smith
and Parr (1998) and Lamb in Simensky et al. (1999, Chapter 5) and Damodoran (1994).
Razgaitis recommends using multiple methods of valuation. Multiple methods produce value
or a coherent range of values that make sense from those multiple perspectives.
Managing of IP assets
The evidence of corporations being increasingly capable of extracting value from
intellectual assets is provided by the growing importance of licensing. This increase in
importance had, according to Manfroy (2002), the following consequences:
(1) Corporate vision changed and many corporations created the position of Chief
(2) Emergence of the Intellectual Capital Model. A model of a company from the
intellectual assets perspective that explains how the different pieces of a corporation
fall together, how they interrelate and their impact on a corporation's intellectual
assets and profitability.
(3) Attention is given to intellectual assets management.
(4) With the increasing importance of intellectual assets licensing professionals are
demanding increased remuneration.
Yang, D . "Intellectual
property abuses: how should multinationals respond?" Long range planning
[0024-6301] 37.5 (2004). 459-475.
This article presents a decidedly pro-business approach to the problem of piracy in China.
From the start, the article takes for granted that weak IPR is a bad thing that
recalcitrant countries are loathe to enforce. The article continues by providing
statistics that show that China is one of the worst infringers in the world of
intellectual property rights.
Ten strategies are listed including the Budweiser strategy (technical solutions), the
partnership strategy (contractual surveillance), the Coca-Cola strategy (narrowing price
gaps), the Microsoft strategy (monitoring and private-eye), the commercial settlement
strategy, the acquiring strategy, the DuPont strategy (reapplication), the MU strategy
(communicating with aggrieved firms), the government hand strategy, and consumer
Xiaobai, S . "A
dilemma for developing countries in intellectual property strategy? Lessons from a case
study of software piracy and Microsoft in China" Science & public policy
[0302-3427] 32.3 (2005). 187-198.
Will businesses and countries invest in the economies of developing countries if these
developing countries do not enforce intellectual property rights on the same standards of
developed countries? And, if the current situation of increasing the strength of
intellectual property rights in developing countries continues, will these developing
countries be able to compete in a world of IPR harmonization?
The article shows that despite this piracy, Microsoft has entered the Chinese market with
great difficulties. Piracy of Microsoft products subsequently increased and contrary to
logic, this led Microsoft to further invest in China in an attempt to promote legal usage
of Microsoft products. This further investment was presumably because Microsoft sees China
as the largest potential market in the world.
Linek, E . "International
Efforts Are Achieving Credible IP Enforcement Even Amid Chronic Abuse"
Intellectual property & technology law journal [1534-3618] 18.3 (2006). 4-7
The statistics present an optimistic view of the situation by stating the increased number
of criminal prosecutions for IPR violations; however, the statistics leave out the
pessimistic view that the number of violations are possibly rising and that could explain
the increase in prosecutions.
property and development : lessons from recent economic research / edited by Carsten Fink
and Keith E. Maskus. Washington, DC : A copublication of the World Bank and Oxford
University Press, New York, 2005.
This book, which is a compilation of essays, constitutes an in depth economic analysis of
how intellectual property rights effect development within an economy. The final essay
focuses on China and is entitled Intellectual Property Rights and Economic
Development in China.
The essay discusses the growth of Chinas economy through an economic analysis of
intellectual property rights and how they affect business and investment.
Rajrathnam V P, Attorney/Advocate and IPR Consultant -