Green-collar crimes are defined as crimes committed against the environment for profit. A crime committed against nature is known as green-collar crime. Illegal logging and deforestation are examples of green-collar crimes. The patterns of illegality in green-collar crimes and environmental crime is a new subject. Green-collar crime is also referred to as Environmental Crime. Green-collar criminologists conduct research into the forms, causes, and consequences of law breaking that harms the environment. Sociologists have begun to develop a framework for examining green-collar crimes. Issues relevant to the subield of green-collar crimes need to be elucidated. Green-collar crime is like other types of collar-crimes and occupational crimes.
Green-collar crimes include a violation of the criminal provisions in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970 and the Federal Pollution Control Act of 1972. The term "green-collar crime" and "green criminology" was introduced by Michael J. Lynch in 1990, and was expanded upon in Nancy Frank and Michael J. Lynch's 1992 book, Corporate Crime, Corporate Violence. The book examined the political and economic origins of green crime, green-collar crime, and the scope of environmental law. Some consider “green crimes” to be a part of white-collar crimes.
In 2013, Ian David Macdonald and David John Downes of the U.K. were the two of the first individuals to be charged with a green-collar crime for their involvement with a carbon credit boiler room scam, ultimately defrauding investors out of $9 million dollars (U.S.). The men were charged with 4 and 8 year prison sentences, proving green-collar crimes are considered serious.
Other collar crimes include: White-collar crime, Blue-collar Crime, Pink-collar Crime, Black-collar crime, and Red-collar Crime.
Green-Collar Offender: Punishment, Culpability, and Environmental Crime
Michael M. O'Hear. Abstract: Federal law regulates waste management and pollution emissions through an intricate system of administrative rules and permits. Violations of these legal requirements may result not only in civil money penalties, but also in criminal prosecution. The federal sentencing guidelines for environmental crimes reflect an ad hoc, largely incoherent approach to guidelines development. In some cases of minimal culpability, the guidelines recommend sentences far in excess of what seems theoretically justifiable.
Green-Collar Crime: Environmental Crime and Justice in the Sociological Perspective - Brian Wolf.
Abstract: This aims to map where criminology has been in the subfield of green-collar crimes. This article is a survey of research relevant to green criminology, and the theoretical dilemmas, and methodological issues associated with studying green-collar crimes. A review of recent studies that have reoriented the field of green-collar crime and paved way for future research.
An offender typology and description is presented to specify what types of social actors may be involved in green-collar crimes or environmental crime. While the patterns of victimization became increasingly clear, relatively little was known about those responsible for green-collar crimes.
Green Collar Criminals: Why Should They Receive Special Treatment? - Jane F. Barrett.
Abstract: Criminal enforcement of federal environmental laws, a novel concept in 1976, has evolved significantly during the last twenty years. Although many aspects of environmental criminal enforcement have changed during this time period.
A new category of federal crime under the head "Green Collar Crime" should be created which would entitle those who violate federal environment law to special treatment and benefits not afforded to "white collar crimes."