|
Sociology of Environment - Abstracts
SOCIOLOGY INDEX |
Environmental Sociology and the
Explanation of Environmental Reform - oae.sagepub.com
Frederick H. Buttel, University of Wisconsin, Madison -
This article makes the case that environmental sociology is in the midst of a significant
shift of problematics, from the explanation of environmental degradation to the
explanation of environmental reform. In this article, the author suggests that there are
four basic mechanisms of environmental reform or improvement: environmental
activism/movements, state environmental regulation, ecological modernization, and
international environmental governance. He suggests further that although `green
consumerism' is one of the most frequently discussed mechanisms of environmental
improvement within environmental sociology and in movement discourse, green consumerist
arguments generally tend to rest on one or more of the other four mechanisms of
environmental reform. One of the main tasks of environmental sociology will be to assess
which of these four mechanisms is the most fundamental to environmental reform. The author
concludes with the hypothesis that environmental movements and activism are ultimately the
most fundamental pillars of environmental reform. Definitional and Responsive
Environmental Meanings: A Meadian Look at Landscapes and Drought
Andrew J. Weigert - blackwell-synergy.com
Current conceptual frameworks differ deeply on the meanings of human-natural environment
relations. One is a monist social constructionist frame: meaning is only in human
definitions, and natural events are meaningless. The other offers dualist perspectives
that locate meaning both in definitions and in realist indications of environmental events
such as global environmental change. After discussing 'landscape' as a bridging concept, I
suggest an ordering of the two perspectives through a metatheoretical distinction between
definitional and responsive meanings with primacy in the response. Finally, I apply a
metatheoretical schema based on the work of George H. Mead to meanings of natural
environment implicated in a discussion of an official pronouncement, 'The drought is
over'. |
Footprints on the Earth: The
Environmental Consequences of Modernity
Richard York, Eugene A. Rosa, Thomas Dietz
American Sociological Review, Vol. 68, No. 2 (Apr., 2003), pp. 279-300
doi:10.2307/1519769 - www.jstor.org
Abstract:
Growing evidence demonstrating clear threats to the sustainability of the ecosystems
supporting human societies has given rise to a variety of sociological theories of
human-environment interactions. These environmental impact theories fall into three
general perspectives: human ecology, modernization, and political economy. These theories,
however, have not been empirically tested in a common analytic framework. Here, a
framework that relies on ecological principles is adopted and modified. Using a revised
stochastic formulation of that framework and the most comprehensive measure of
environmental impact to date--the ecological footprint--the factors driving the
environmental impacts of societies are assessed. The overall findings support the claims
of human ecologists, partially support the claims of political economists, and contradict
the claims of modernization theorists. Basic material conditions, such as population,
economic production, urbanization, and geographical factors all affect the environment and
explain the vast majority of cross-national variation in environmental impact. Factors
derived from neo-liberal modernization theory, such as political freedom, civil liberties,
and state environmentalism have no effect on impacts. Taken together, these findings
suggest societies cannot be sanguine about achieving sustainability via a continuation of
current trends in economic growth and institutional change.
A Very Brief History of
the Origins of environmental ethics for the Novice - The inspiration for environmental
ethics was the first Earth Day in 1970 when environmentalists started urging philosophers
who were involved with environmental groups to do something about environmental ethics. -
cep.unt.edu/novice.html
Mulberg, Jon - "Environment and Sociology: The State of the Debate"
Global Environmental Politics - Volume 3, Number 1, February 2003, pp. 125-142 The MIT
Press
Excerpt - muse.jhu.edu
Just before the events of 11th September, President George W. Bush initiated a controversy
on the issue of global warming, by denying that the problem existed and by withdrawing
from an international agreement concerning its prevention. At the same time as this, the
UK rural economy was being devastated by agricultural disease. Environmental risk is now
front page news.
In this regard, the volume edited by Spaargaren, Mol, and Buttel might be regarded as
timely, in that it provides a useful overview of the main literature and debates in the
field of environmental sociology. The collection is based on a regional conference of the
environment research group of the International Sociological Association, and is one of
several "overviews" of the literature in books and journals over the last few
years.
Although the book is not subdivided in any way, it is possible to loosely identify four
main themes. Firstly, there are attempts to map out the approaches to environmental
sociology, and identify the underlying "axis of disagreement" of the differing
theoretical schemas. From these axis, three distinct debates emerge from the chapters in
the collection. The question of the extent to which classical social theory can offer any
insights into global environmental issues is a major area of contention. A second debate,
which has been prominent in the literature for some time, concerns the extent to which
questions of environment are socially constructed. However, the main business of the book
concerns the theory of ecological modernization, of which two of the editors are among the
main developers, and much of the collection concerns expositions and critiques of this
approach. [End Page 125]. The volume plays down the matter of disagreement and debate
though. The stated aim in the preface is to find common ground, both within sociology and
between other...
| |
|