DOCUMENTARY METHOD OF INTERPRETATION
The term 'documentary method of interpretation' was used by Karl Mannheim and
Alfred Schutz, but its current meaning derives from Harold Garfinkel, the founder of ethnomethodology.
Harold Garfinkel asserts that the documentary method is a method which lay persons
and sociologists alike use in commonsense reasoning
about the world.
Documentary method of interpretation consists of treating an actual appearance as
the document of, or as pointing to, a presupposed underlying pattern.
The child's choice of toys (a boy choosing a truck or a girl choosing a doll) is
seen as an indication of an underlying pattern of biological preferences (or for the
sociologist, of gender socialization).
Further, there is a reciprocal relationship between the document and
the underlying pattern: the underlying pattern is now given some legitimacy because of the
observation of the individual document - the child's choice of toys.
People employ a documentary method of interpretation, by treating
actual appearances as the document of, as pointing to, as
standing on behalf of a presupposed underlying pattern (Mannheim, quoted
in Garfinkel 1967) and tap into this stream of agency through experimental
interactivity (Rammert 1999).
"Documentary method of interpretation. The Documentary
Method is the method of understanding utilized by everyone engaged in trying to make sense
of their social world - this includes the ethnomethodologist. ... Mannheim defined the
term as a search for an identical homologous pattern of meaning underlying a variety of
totally different realizations of that meaning. Garfinkel states that the documentary
method of interpretation consists of treating an actual appearance as the "document
of", "as pointing to", as "standing on behalf of", a presupposed
underlying pattern (Garfinkel:1967:78). These "documents" serve to constitute
the underlying pattern, but are themselves interpreted on the basis of what is already
known about that underlying pattern. This seeming paradox is quite familiar to
hermeneuticians who understand this phenomenon as a version of the hemeneutic circle
(Okrent:1988:157-172). This phenomenon is also subject to analysis from the perspective of
Gestalt theory [part/whole relationships], and the phenomenological theory of perception (see
The Interpretation of Pictures and the Documentary Method - Ralf
Abstract: The considerable progress in qualitative methods is directly connected with
developments in the field of text-interpretation. On the basis of a thorough
reconstruction of their formal structures texts are treated as autonomous domains of
self-referential systems. Such a methodological status has been denied to pictures in
empirical research in the field of social sciences up until now. The documentary method,
based on Karl MANNHEIM's Sociology of Knowledge, opens up methodical access to pictures.
Methodologies from art history (PANOFSKY, IMDAHL) can thus become relevant for empirical
research in social sciences. Connections to semiotics (BARTHES, ECO) and philosophy
(FOUCAULT) are worked out in their consequences for qualitative methods. Thus verbal
contextual and pre-knowledge can be controlled methodically in the documentary
interpretation of pictures. The reconstruction of formal structure of pictures becomes of
central importance in analysis.
Ideology and Reality Work. On the Analysis of Power and Dominance on
Abstract: This text deals with what could be understood as a rather impossible enterprise,
namely to combine two analytical perspectives which are not fully compatible: an
ethnomethodologically inspired analytical approach, with a subject which has interested
political scientists for a long time, namely "ideology". The general aim is to
attempt to demonstrate how ethnomethodologically inspired analyses can be combined with
more traditional analyses of "ideology", "traditional" in the sense of
analyses which take the natural attitude (as understood within phenomenology) as
Of central importance is the continuous reality work, interpreted as the methodical work
by which members of society together achieve and maintain the belief in and sense of a
common world of "facts". This work is carried out in normal, everyday situations
with the natural attitude as unproblematically given and with the help of the
"documentary method of interpretation". Of interest is thus the question of the
ideological potential of the documentary method of interpretation when it is used with the
natural attitude as unproblematically given.
Documentary Interpretation of Narrative Interviews - Arnd-Michael Nohl
The Narrative Interview (developed by Fritz Schuetze) and the Documentary Method of
Interpretation (by Ralf Bohnsack) are two of the major methods of qualitative-empirical
research on education. In this contribution I discuss why and how Narrative Interviews can
be interpreted with the Documentary Method. While the Documentary Interpretation of
Narrative Interviews draws back on elements of the Narration-Structure Analysis, it
emphasizes comparative analysis and development of types.
Working with images in daily life and police practice: an assessment of
the documentary tradition - Mike Ball, Staffordshire University, Qualitative
Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, (2005)
There is a growing body of literature within the humanities and social sciences that is
directly critical of the documentary traditions treatment and use of still and
moving images as realistic data. The documentary tradition claims that it is possible to
visually document social scenes with cameras. Postmodernism, poststructuralism, critical
theory and related traditions argue that still and moving images amount to
representations, their critique of realism. As instruments, cameras are open to a variety
of uses ranging from the scientific to the artistic in orientation. Such uses of cameras
comprise representational work. Following Garfinkel, this article suggests that the
documentary method of sense making is employed in numerous practical situations.
This article commences with an overview of the documentary tradition and then offers a
brief case study of certain of these principles in operation within the practical work of
the police and road users on public highways. Public highways and traffic flows along them
are visually available social arrangements. Within police work that involves the
regulation and management of traffic flows, stored images of vehicles can serve as
documentary evidence of traffic violations. In this particular context and more generally
on the highways, road users treat objects such as road signs and related items of roadside
furniture, including cameras and road markings, as documents of some, for all practical
purposes, real states of affairs. Road users make sense of the stream of visual
information encountered as an ongoing practical accomplishment.